Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 0(1(1(0(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(1(0(x1))))

Q is empty.

(1) NonTerminationProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.

Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure:

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
by OverlapClosure OC 2

0 0 0 0 → 0 1 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 → 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
by OverlapClosure OC 2

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 → 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 → 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 → 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
by OverlapClosure OC 3

1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 → 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
by OverlapClosure OC 2

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 0 1 → 0 0 0 0 1 0
by OverlapClosure OC 2

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

0 0 0 0 → 0 1 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

0 0 0 0 → 0 1 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

0 0 0 0 → 0 1 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

0 0 0 0 → 0 1 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

1 0 0 1 → 0 0 1 0
by original rule (OC 1)

(2) NO